Conopco Inc v. Procter and Gamble Co., Paper 25, No. IPR2014-00506 (10 December 2014) – Informative
Petitioner, Conopco dba Unilever (“Unilever”), requests a rehearing of the Decision on Institution (Paper 17, “Dec.”) by an expanded panel that includes the Chief Administrative Patent Judge (“Chief Judge”).1 Paper 19, “Rehearing Req.” Specifically, Unilever seeks rehearing of our decision declining to institute an inter partes review of claims 13–14, 16, 20–22, 24–25, 27, 31, and 33 of U.S. Patent No. 6,974,569 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’569 patent”). Paper 17.
