Klarquist News & Insights

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Attorneys Included in the 2017 Best Lawyers in America® List

Klarquist is proud to have six attorneys named to the 2017 Best Lawyers in America® list: Lisa M. Caldwell in the area of Trademark Law; James E. Geringer in the areas of IP Litigation, Patent Litigation, and Trademark Law; Ramon A. Klitzke II in the areas of Patent Law and Trademark Law; William D. Noonan, M.D. in the area of […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Attorney Publishes Article Discussing the Current State of “Plain Meaning” Patent Claim Construction

Below is a link to an article written by Klarquist’s John Vandenberg concerning current issues in patent claim construction. In the article, titled “We Need Another Phillips To Explain ‘Plain Meaning’ Patent Claim Construction,” John covers four questions about “plain meaning” construction on which the Federal Circuit is divided or the Federal Circuit appears to have […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Attorneys Named to the 2016 Oregon Super Lawyers® List

Klarquist is proud to have Ramon A. Klitzke II, Jeffrey S. Love, and John D. Vandenberg named to the 2016 Oregon Super Lawyers® list, and Carla Todenhagen selected for inclusion on the 2016 Oregon Rising Stars℠ list. The annual survey is published by Thomson Reuters. Surveys of attorneys throughout the country as well as in […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Ranks Among Top Firms in 2016 BTI Power Rankings

Klarquist has been recognized in the BTI Power Rankings 2016 as one of the law firms having the strongest relationships with their clients. The list, published by BTI Consulting Group, ranks more than 500 law firms in 16 industries based on the strength of their client relationships. Klarquist was named a “Clientopia Leader” for being […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Attorneys Receive IAM Patent 1000 Ranking

Klarquist received top national rankings in the 2016 edition of Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) magazine’s IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Practitioners. IAM noted that, “Klarquist Sparkman continues to dominate the local market. It also has a sterling national reputation and is one of the few firms tasked by the US administration with protecting inventions cooked […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Receives Top Tier Ranking from Chambers USA

Klarquist has received a top tier ranking from Chambers USA for 2016. Klarquist is recognized as one of two top tier intellectual property law firms in Oregon. In addition, three Klarquist attorneys, Scott E. Davis, William D. Noonan, M.D., and John D. Vandenberg, received individual recognition for intellectual property. Sources say: “Klarquist Sparkman is a very […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist to Host INTA Roundtable: As the World Turns – International Trademark Developments

On April 11, 2016, Klarquist partner Ramon Klitzke will host the International Trademark Association’s roundtable discussion “As the World Turns – International Trademark Developments.” International trademark developments will no doubt have far reaching ramifications and affect business strategies going forward. Join us to discuss recent changes in various international trademark laws, including: Expanded local laws […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Klarquist Files Brief Of Microsoft Corporation And Professors As Amici Curiae In Supreme Court Case On Patent Claim Construction: Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee

How an issued patent claim is construed depends on which judge construes it. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) judges give patent claims their “broadest reasonable interpretation” while trial judges give claims their “plain and ordinary meaning.” Petitioner asks the Supreme Court to force the PTAB to instead use the same “plain and ordinary meaning” […]

Read More

KLARQUIST NEWS

Judge Robert L. Pitman Grants Judgment to Klarquist Client eBay, Inc.

On February 29, 2016, Judge Robert L. Pitman of the Western District of Texas granted judgment on the pleadings to Klarquist client eBay, Inc., finding U.S. Patent No. 7,010,572 invalid under 35 USC § 101 for failing to claim patent-eligible subject matter. Judge Pitman held that the asserted claims failed the Supreme Court’s two-part Alice […]

Read More